Theoretical Issues in Taxation
* Reliability of revenue
flow
- does the tax bring in money is a
predictable and regular rate
-> for funding
general government, it had better
- for special
projects or one-time deals it doesn't matter
- if you can't
predict the growth or decline of funding, a government can't plan
* Impact on the private
economy
- Taxes that are too high can depress the
private economy
-> if taxes on
income are prohibitively high, people won't bother to work
-> if business
taxes are too high, no one will open a new business
- any taxes suck
money out of the economy that would otherwise be spent or invested
-> not a
problem if the government puts the $ to good use, but…
- poorly designed
taxes can push people into or out of businesses and activities irrationally
-> a tax break
on some activity will suck people into that field
- generally
speaking, a tax cut will speed the economy and a rise will slow it
* Impact on the citizenry
- taxes to build
nice things are still to high if they cause people to starve
- if the economy is
going down, raising taxes will simply increase pain
* Complexity
- if a tax is too
complex, people will find it annoying to pay
- government may
also find it impossible to correct properly
-> the more
complex, the more chance of loopholes and legal challenges
* Matching of goals to
taxes
- in general, taxes
should apply to things that match the revenue source
-> property
taxes pay for local schools, fire departments, and police
-> car tabs and
licensing fees pay for transportation
-> taxes called
social security should pay for social security
- obviously general
government requires general taxes
-> sales or
income taxes
- if taxes are too
"apples for oranges" people may find them annoying
* Progressive,
Regressive, or Flat taxation
- progressive means
that the more money a person has, the more they pay
-> income, car
tab, and the proposed "latte tax" are all progressive
-> to some, the
rich should pay more because they have a duty to share
-> since
government also benefits them more, the argument goes, they pay more
-> the
"Robin Hood Effect" of progressive taxation can also ease problem of
economic
inequality
=> can be important
in avoiding rioting, crime, etc.
- regressive
taxation means that the less a person has, the more they pay
-> sales taxes,
consumption taxes, and others hit the poor as a higher % of income
-> these taxes
tend to be more reliable, simple, and hard to avoid
-> it's
obviously a bit unfair to tax the poor more if they can't afford it
- flat taxation
means that everyone pays either the same % of their income
-> Property taxes do this. A 10-20% flat income tax is often proposed as
well.
-> idea revolves around the fairness of everyone paying the same percentage
-> the rich would still pay more since they have more money
* Fairness
- if taxes seem unfair to the people, they will not pay them or will riot