European Imperialism in Africa and Asia

 

* Drive (Why do it?)

   - European industrialization created need for markets and raw materials

     -> metals, coal, fiber plants, and rubber needed to feed factories

     -> someone needs to buy all the goods produced

         => European factory workers only need so much cloth or so many forks

   - competition

     -> as European countries take colonies, other powers want to keep up

     -> even before proof of benefits, a rush to cut up the world

     -> England, France, Portugal, Spain, and Dutch in first

     -> U.S., Belgium, Germany, and Italy play catch-up

* Ability

   - steam ships radically cut passage time, increase transport capacity

   - rail allows penetration of the interior

   - quinine makes it possible to survive malaria

   - machine gun allows you to exterminate pesky natives

   - capital growth in Europe creates massive funds for use

* Models of control of the "The Natives"

   - direct rule

     -> the French, German, Belgian, and Portuguese model (usually)

     -> paternalistic European professionals run the colonies

          => boss white man tells you what to do and how to do it

     -> locals assimilated into European culture if possible

         => French taught French and French history as much as possible

         => destroys local culture as much as possible

     -> European governors take all credit and blame

         => good in success, nightmarish when locals see your weaknesses

   - indirect rule

     -> the British model (usually)

     -> relied on existing local leaders

        => those groups/individuals who don't cooperate are destroyed

        => those who do cooperate are rewarded

              +> Brits looked of malleable (shapeable/controllable) respectable locals

        => British created leaders who were then dependent on Brits for their power

              instead of dependent on their people

              +> they care more about what is good for the Brits than for their own people

     -> this process allows you to play the locals off against each other

          => blame for colonial oppression falls on local leaders

          => requests for improvement go through local leaders, so Brits barely have to

                listen

     -> does preserve some local customs and rules

          => cultures controlled and warped, but not destroyed

* Resistance

   - with poor resources and technology, active resistance was difficult

     -> colonial conquest was relatively easy after the machine gun and quinine

   - careful use of diplomacy could give breathing room

     -> Menelik II of Ethiopia played European powers off  against each other

        => he had no army, so used the threat of others'

     -> as he stalled, Menelik also built up a decent modern army

        => Italy finally did make a play and was beaten off at the Battle of Adowa

     -> Ethiopia a lucky exception, not a replicable model

        => had their been diamonds in Ethiopia, it falls

   - resistance often centered on everyday stubbornness

     -> locals refused to show up for work details

     -> European "improvements" were destroyed in the night  

     -> taxes evaded

     -> created chieftains strangled in their beds

     -> midnight and back-bush traditional ceremonies take place outside of the colonial v

          vision

          => occasional rebellions like that of the Mau Mau Revolt in Kenya

* Long-term effects of colonialism

   - African, Indian, Vietnamese, Pakistani, etc. nationalism

     -> the invasion of European nations created counter-nationalisms

     -> the arbitrary boundaries that the Europeans carved created nations out of nothing

        => often, boundaries united unconnected people

           +> Nigeria, Congo, Kenya, etc. a hodge-podge of groups

        => often, these boundaries combined enemies

           +> slaughter between Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda

           +> Muslims and Hindus in India

        => sometimes, boundaries divided united people

           +> Middle Eastern Muslims

           +> Kuwaiti border an issue for Iraq

     -> the first independence leaders of Africa had learned the nationalistic model from Europe

        => an ironic triumph of assimilation

   - undeniable benefits of colonialism

     -> railroads and roads did unite areas

        => despite corruption and exploitation, they were still a benefit

     -> European medical knowledge spread

        => horrifying African diseases treated

     -> local warfare was reduced

        => now, everyone was oppressed by the same white people

     -> schools, universities, hospitals, and literacy spread

   - decline of African culture

     -> European religion and law seriously impacted African religions

     -> family and marriage structures limited to the European model by law where

          possible

     -> traditional education undermined by the obvious survival/success necessity of

          European education

         => traditional educational models actively fought by colonial powers

     -> more powerful African groups assimilated smaller, weaker African groups

        => a sort of subsidiary colonialism

        => need for anti-European unity pushed local groups to an unnatural uniformity

           +> Sati in India as an invented "national" tradition

           +> the Zulu state as pan-African amalgamation

     -> local agricultural and economic models erased

        => communal ownership and control privatized

        => inter-group trade relations cut by borders and taxes

        => transition to cash crops often created famine as food crops abandoned

        => best land stolen by the Whites